2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
Special Acknowledgement
We wish to thank the following companies for their sponsorship which has funded the development of the 2009 Best Practices Study and the Best Practices Gateway website.
Copyright © 2009, Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America, Inc. and Reagan Consulting. All rights reserved.
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Under $1,250,000
Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000 Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Between $2,500,000 and $5,000,000 Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000 Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000 Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98 Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Over $25,000,000 Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 Revenues/Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102 Financial Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Employee Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112 Producer Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113 Service Staff Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .117 Insurance Carriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .118 Appendix Population Density Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121 Regional Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123 Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
INTRODUCTION
About the Study
Since 1993 the annual Best Practices Study has served as a tool to help agency owners and managers understand how their business operations perform and measure up to the top performing firms across the country. It is a “must have” for those agencies that want to become the best they can be. The 2009 Best Practices Study provides critical performance benchmarks in six agency revenue categories ranging from Under $1,250,000 to Over $25,000,000 . Agencies can measure, evaluate, and compare results for agency operations including: > Income & Expense Distribution > Revenue & Profitability Growth > Sales & Service Staff Compensation/Productivity > Technology Expenses > Property & Casualty and Life & Health Carrier Representation > And much more The agencies that participate in the annual study are selected for inclusion once every 3 years. This year’s study continues to look at the performance of those agencies selected in 2007 and completes the 3-year cycle. Because it updates only key financial and operational benchmarks, users of the 2009 update may wish also to purchase a copy of the 2007 Best Practices Study which provides additional information on the agencies’ business practices and philosophies. The comprehensive 2007 study can be purchased from the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America (Big “I”) Education Department. Order forms can be downloaded at http://bp.reaganconsulting.com or at www.independentagent.com. For more information please call 1-800-221-7917.
The History
The annual Best Practices Study originated in 1993 as an initiative by the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America (the Big “I”) to help its members build and maintain the value of their most important assets, their agencies. By studying the leading agencies and brokers in the country, the association hoped to provide members agents with meaningful performance benchmarks and business strategies that could be adopted or adapted for use in improving agency performance, thus enhancing agency value. The Big “I” retained the principals of Reagan Consulting to create and perform the first Best Practices Study . Annual updates conducted by Reagan Consulting continue to provide important financial and operational benchmarks, and the study is recognized as one of the most thoughtful, effective and valuable resources ever made available to the industry. Once every three years the Big “I” asks insurance companies, state association affiliates, and other industry organizations to nominate for each of the study’s revenue categories those agencies they consider to be among the better, more professional agencies in the industry. The nominated agencies are then invited to participate. They must be willing to share key business practices/philosophies and to complete an in- depth survey detailing their financial and operational year-end results. Those results are then scored and The Process
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
ranked objectively for inclusion on the basis of operational excellence.
> Access other Best Practices studies, tools & products > Download order forms
In 2007, the beginning of a new three-year study cycle, more than 800 independent agencies throughout the U.S. were nominated to take part in the annual study. More than 300 submitted the extensive data, but only 195 qualified for the honor. To be chosen, the agency had to be among the 25-35 top-performing agencies in one of six revenue categories. Their year-end results and business practices were compiled to create the Best Practices benchmarks. Those benchmarks are updated annually. Taking part in the Best Practices Study has become a prestigious recognition of the superior accomplishments of the top insurance agencies in the country. Those agencies that believe they have the qualities of a Best Practices Agency and wish to be nominated in 2010 for the next study cycle should contact their state association.
Other Best Practices Studies and Tools
In addition to the annual Best Practices Study, many other useful studies, resources, and tools are available to help agencies improve their performance and enhance the value of their businesses. Two of the most frequently used tools are The Agency Self- Diagnostic Tool and the Joint Agency Company Planner . These Best Practices tools are part of a complete line of Best Practices products and services. Order forms can be downloaded from http://bp.reaganconsulting.com or can be purchased online at www.independentagent.com.
If You Have Questions
About the Best Practices Gateway Website
If you have questions about the information published in the 2009 Best Practices Study please contact the Big “I” Education Department at 800-221-7917 or Reagan Consulting at 404-233-5545.
The electronic version of this study can be accessed via the websites of the Big “I” (www.independentagent.com) and Reagan Consulting (www.reaganconsulting.com).
From the Best Practices Gateway home page users can do the following:
> View an HTML version of the current and past Best Practice Study Executive Updates > Download a Best Practices comparison spreadsheet to compare their year-end results with the study’s results
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
Agencies with Revenues Under $1,250,000
$1,250,000
$2,500,000
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$25,000,000
2009 Best Practices Study
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
PROFILE (of Agencies in this Study Group)
A. Average Total Revenues: $719,335
B. Population Density of Metropolitan Areas Where Home Office is Located Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Less than 50,000 50,000 – 250,000 250,000 – 1,000,000 More than 1,000,000 C. Corporate Structure C
61.3% 12.9%
59.0% 12.8% 12.8% 15.4%
61.7% 10.6% 12.8% 14.9%
9.7%
16.1%
32.3% 51.6%
25.6% 53.8%
27.7% 51.1%
S
Partnership
3.2% 6.5% 6.5%
2.6% 7.7%
4.3% 6.4%
LLC
Sole Proprietorship
10.3%
10.6%
1.1
1.0
1.1
Total # Agency locations
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
Agency has an ESOP
% of Stock Owned by ESOP
D. Shareholders Number of Shareholders (excluding ESOP)
1.7 3.0 1.0
1.9
2.0
High
Low
E. Ownership Percentage % Owned by Largest Shareholder (excluding ESOP)
81.1% 100.0% 46.0%
78.4%
61.6%
High
Low
F. Shareholder Age Current Age of Largest Shareholder
52.9
50.5
53.4
G. Parent Corporation
0.0%
Agency is Owned by Another Corporation
Description of Parent Corporation Financial Institution
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
National Broker
Other
1 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Profile
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenues
(% by Source)
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Property & Casualty Commercial Commissions & Fees
45.1%
39.4%
44.8%
Bonds
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
Personal P&C
38.5%
47.8%
34.0%
Value Added Services
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
Contingent/Bonus
7.8%
4.3%
8.6%
Total P&C
92.2%
92.3%
88.2%
Life & Health/Financial Group Commissions & Fees
4.6%
6.0%
5.3%
Individual Commissions & Fees
1.8%
1.5%
3.5%
Value Added Services
0.7%
0.0%
2.7%
Bonus/Overrides
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Total L&H/Financial
7.2%
7.5%
11.5%
Investments
0.6%
0.2%
0.3%
Miscellaneous
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
Gross Revenues
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Less Brokerage Commission Expense
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Net Revenues
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Future Revenue Sources % of Agencies Considering Line of Business as Very Important:
Personal Lines
83.9% 90.3% 16.1% 22.6% 12.9%
Small Commercial Lines Individual Life & Health Group Life & Health
Surety/Bonding
2 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenues
% of Revenues Derived from:
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Largest Account
4.0%
3.4%
4.0%
High
17.6%
Low
1.2%
10 Largest Accounts
15.3% 44.6%
10.5%
17.1%
High
Low
3.4%
Acquired Revenues
Average Commissions Acquired
% of Agencies Acquiring
Percentage of Net Revenues
Acquisitions Made in Last 12 Months
0.0%
$0
0.0%
What the Typical Transactions Looked Like Revenues Acquired per Transaction
Multiples of Revenue Paid
Average
$0 $0 $0 $0
Average
0.00x 0.00x 0.00x 0.00x
Median
Median
High
High
Low
Low
3 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenue Growth by Source
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Commercial P&C Renewals 1
1 Renewal Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. This figure is impacted by attrition (loss or retention of accounts) and by changes in premium and commission levels. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 2 New Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 3 Acquired Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The % indicates the significance of acquired business. 4 Growth in Revenues from prior year excluding acquired revenues. 5 Growth in Revenues from prior year including acquired revenues.
83.9% 15.0% 0.0% -1.1% -1.1% 71.1% 28.2% 0.0% -0.6% -0.6% 89.3% 10.2% 0.0% -0.5% -0.5%
88.7% 13.9%
81.8% 25.3%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 2.6% 2.6%
0.0% 7.1% 7.1%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Bonds
Renewals 1
84.5% 33.9%
65.9% 26.4% 0.0% -7.7% -7.7%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0%
Organic Growth 4
18.4% 18.4%
Total Growth 5
Personal P&C
Renewals 1
88.9% 11.2%
91.3%
New Business 2
9.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5%
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Value Added Services - P&C Renewals 1
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Group L&H
Renewals 1
67.7% 29.0% 0.0% -3.3% -3.3%
44.5% 53.6% 0.0% -1.9% -1.9%
77.5% 20.9% 0.0% -1.6% -1.6%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Individual L&H
Renewals 1
54.9% 48.6%
24.9% 78.0%
108.1% 15.7%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 3.5% 3.5%
0.0% 2.8% 2.8%
0.0%
Organic Growth 4
23.7% 23.7%
Total Growth 5
*Insufficient Data
4 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenue Growth by Source (continued)
Average +25% Profit +25% Growth
Value Added Services - L&H Renewals 1
1 Renewal Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. This figure is impacted by attrition (loss or retention of accounts) and by changes in premium and commission levels. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 2 New Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 3 Acquired Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The % indicates the significance of acquired business. 4 Growth in Revenues from prior year excluding acquired revenues. 5 Growth in Revenues from prior year including acquired revenues.
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Total Commissions & Fees Renewals 1
84.7% 86.7% 85.0% 15.4% 17.0% 24.2%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
0.0% 3.7% 3.7%
0.0% 9.1% 9.1%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
P&C Contingent Income Growth L&H Bonus Income Growth Investment Income Growth
-12.3%
-5.9%
5.7%
*
* *
*
-32.9%
-39.2%
Total Revenue Growth
-0.6%
2.2% 12.0%
Brokerage Commission Expense Growth Net Revenue Growth (Organic)
*
*
*
-0.5% -0.5%
2.2% 12.3% 2.2% 12.3%
Net Revenue Growth (Total)
*Insufficient Data
5 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Organic Growth by Line of Business
20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
-5.0%
2.0% 1.0% -1.0% 0.0% -2.0%
Insufficient Data
1.0% 0.0% -1.0% -2.0% -3.0% -4.0%
5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%
Insufficient Data
Revenue Growth by All Sources (including Total Comm & Fees, Contingent/Bonus and Investment Income)
6 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Breakdown of Expenses — What This Means to You
In the past the study has consolidated revenues and expenses into fairly broad categories making some comparisons difficult. Factors such as corporate structure (e.g., C corporation versus S corporation) further complicated expense comparisons because of what was or was not reflected on the income statement. The study now provides greater detail for both revenues and expenses which has resulted in more meaningful benchmarks for better “apples-to-apples” comparisons. The new expense breakdowns include: Compensation Expense – Both Payroll and Benefits have been broken down to provide a better understanding of the participating agencies’ costs – what costs are somewhat fixed (payroll taxes) versus discretionary costs (retirement benefits, insurance, etc.). Selling & Operating Expense –These expense categories now include greater detail, including any depreciation and amortization expense associated with the category. This allows for a more accurate picture of the total expenses incurred as both cash (e.g. monthly lease payment) and non-cash expenses (e.g. computer depreciation expense) are captured.
Expenses (as % of Net Revenues)
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Compensation Expenses Payroll Employee
44.9%
34.2%
44.1%
“Non-Employee” Producers
4.0% 0.1%
6.0% 0.2%
3.9% 0.0%
Temporary Help Total Payroll
49.0%
40.4%
48.3%
Benefits
Payroll Taxes Retirement
4.0% 2.4% 3.3% 0.1% 9.9% 1.5% 1.7% 0.4% 2.1% 2.4% 6.0% 58.9%
3.8% 1.3% 1.6% 0.0% 6.8% 1.5% 1.2% -0.5% 0.7% 2.3% 4.5% 47.2%
3.2% 2.4% 3.2% 0.0% 8.7% 1.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.8% 2.2% 5.0% 57.0%
Insurance
Other
Total Benefits
Total Compensation
Selling Expenses T&E/Conventions Auto Expenditures Auto Depreciation
Total Auto
Advertising/Promotions
Total Selling
7 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Expenses (continued)
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Operating Expenses Occupancy Expenditures
5.2% 0.1% 5.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 2.0% 0.1% 2.1% 1.4% 0.7% 1.3% 1.0% 0.4% 2.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0% 1.5%
5.1% -0.2% 4.9% 0.8% -0.1% 0.7% 1.4% 0.0% 1.4% 2.0% 0.6% 1.7% 1.2% 0.5% 2.5% 0.8% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 17.9%
5.2% -0.3% 4.9% 0.9% -0.3% 0.6% 2.6% 0.1% 2.6% 1.4% 0.6% 1.5% 1.1% 0.4% 2.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.8% 0.3% 17.2%
Occupancy Depreciation/Amortization
Total Occupancy
Office Equipment Expenditures Office Equipment Depreciation
Total Office Equipment
IT (Information Technology) IT Depreciation/Amortization
Total IT
Telephone
Postage
Supplies/Printing
Dues/Subscriptions/Contributions
Taxes/Licenses
Insurance
Professional Fees
Bad Debts
Outside Services Education/Training
Miscellaneous
Total Operating
17.0%
Administrative Expenses Amortization of Intangibles
0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 1.2%
0.1% 0.1% 1.1% 0.0% 1.4%
Officer Life
Interest
Other
Total Administrative
Total Expenses
83.4% 16.6% 18.5%
70.8% 29.2% 29.2%
80.6% 19.4% 20.1%
Pre-Tax Profit (Loss)
EBITDA
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Growth Over Prior Year Compensation Expense
2.7% 2.0% 1.8%
-1.2% -9.1%
8.5% 8.7% 2.3% -8.5%
Selling Expense
Operating Expense
5.6%
Administrative Expense
-15.3%
-17.0%
8 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Expenses (as % of Net Revenue)
Revenue/Expense/Profit Summary
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Revenues (% by Source) Commercial Lines
45.1%
39.4%
44.8%
1 Pre-tax Profits if discretionary expenses are eliminated (e.g. certain owner’s perks/benefits), and one- time or extraordinary revenues are excluded 2 Pre-tax Profits excluding income from contingents, bonus and investment income 3 EBITDA—Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization 4 EBITDA if discretionary expenses are eliminated (e.g. certain owner’s perks/benefits), and one- time or extraordinary revenues are excluded
Bonds
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
Personal Lines
38.5%
47.8%
34.0%
VAS - P&C
0.2% 7.8% 4.6% 1.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1%
0.0% 4.3% 6.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%
0.1% 8.6% 5.3% 3.5% 2.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%
Contingent/Bonus Group Life & Health Individual Life & Health
VAS - L&H
Bonus/Overrides Investments Miscellaneous
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Total Revenues
Less Brokerage Commission Expense
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Net Revenues
Expenses (as % of Net Revenues) Compensation
58.9%
47.2%
57.0%
Selling
6.0%
4.5%
5.0%
Operating
17.0%
17.9%
17.2%
Administrative
1.5%
1.2%
1.4%
Total Expenses
83.4%
70.8%
80.6%
Pre-Tax Profit
16.6% 23.0%
29.2% 39.5% 15.9% 29.2% 39.4%
19.4% 25.0%
Pro Forma Pre-Tax Profit 1 Operating Pre-Tax Profit 2
5.0%
6.9%
EBITDA 3
18.5% 24.8%
20.1% 25.7%
Pro Forma EBITDA 4
9 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Profitability
“Rule of 20” Score
The “Rule of 20” provides a quick means of calculating whether or not an agency is creating significant returns for its shareholders. It is the sum of an agency’s EBITDA margin times 50% plus its organic revenue growth rate. The secret to the Rule of 20 is the weighting of the relative importance of organic growth versus EBITDA when it comes to creating shareholder returns. Generally speaking, an outcome of 20 or higher means an agency is generating a shareholder return that is equal to or greater than that typically expected of an insurance agency/brokerage. A score of less than 20 indicates room for improvement. However, this year’s outcomes reflect the severity of the soft market over the past year. Positive organic growth was difficult to achieve and shareholder returns were adversely impacted.
Rule of 20 Outcome
Organic Growth
EBITDA Margin
Rule of 20 Outcome
Rank Public Brokers
1 Willis Group
4.0% 24.3% 16.2
2 Aon
2.0% 20.1% 12.1
3 Brown & Brown
-5.5% 35.1% 12.1
4 Arthur J. Gallagher
1.4% 16.2% 9.5
5 Marsh & McLennan 0.0% 13.9% 7.0
In 2008 none of the public brokers achieved a Rule of 20 outcome of 20 or more, as shown in the table above.
Average
+25% Profit Average +25% Growth Average
“Rule of 20” Score
11.9
21.9
25.1
10
2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Financial Stability
Top 25%
Average
Balance Sheet Current Ratio
1.16:1 12.0% 68.5%
1.63:1 33.9% -19.2%
Tangible Net Worth (% of Net Revenue)
Receivables/Payable Ratio
Aged Receivables
% Receivables Aged Past 60 Days % Receivables Aged Past 90 Days
15.6% 25.1%
1.1% 2.2%
Accounts Receivable
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Agency Billed vs. Direct Billed by Carrier % of P&C Revenues that are Agency Billed % of P&C Revenues that are Direct Billed
12.1% 81.5%
3.0%
12.1% 75.4%
72.0%
11 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Financial Stability
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Productivity
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Total Number of Employees (FTE)
6.2
5.8
6.2
Revenue Per Employee
$121,893
$117,416
$131,667
Compensation Per Employee
$73,395
$55,494
$79,835
Spread Per Employee
$48,498
$61,923
$51,832
12 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Employee Overview
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Productivity—Producers
Average
Top 25%
Commercial P&C Producers Average Validated Producers # Validated
1.4 3.0 0.5
High
Low
Average New Commissions Produced Annually
$34,741 $160,840 $70,092
$58,285 $268,277
Average Book Serviced (Commissions)
Average Pay ($)
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
43.6%
Group Life & Health Producers Average Validated Producers # Validated
0.9 1.0 0.5
High
Low
Average New Commissions Produced Annually
$14,070 $75,520 $54,770
$30,461 $143,050
Average Book Serviced (Commissions)
Average Pay ($)
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
72.5%
Personal P&C Producers Average Validated Producers # Validated
1.0 2.5
High
Low
0.3
Average New Commissions Produced Annually
$23,693 $115,338 $31,472
$40,915 $191,411
Average Book Serviced (Commissions)
Average Pay ($)
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
27.3%
Multi-Line Producers Average Validated Producers # Validated
2.2 3.0
High
Low
1.0
Average New Commissions Produced Annually
$35,910 $251,685 $79,674
$56,281 $381,390
Average Book Serviced (Commissions)
Average Pay ($)
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
31.7%
*Insufficient Data
13 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Producer Info
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Productivity—Producers (continued)
Most Successful Producer Productivity
Commercial P&C
Group L&H
$45,815
$24,471
Average
New Commissions Produced Annually
Top 25%
$57,083
$42,961
$299,829
$99,202
Average
Total Commissions in Producer’s Book
Top 25%
$412,223
$195,000
$2,295
$4,480
Average
Average Commissions per Account
Top 25%
$13,582
$4,857
How Most Successful Producers Spent Time
Commercial P&C
Group L&H
Producer Information
New Producer Hiring
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
% of Agencies that Hired New Producers Last Year
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
# of New Producers Hired Last Year
* *
* *
* *
Average Annualized Wages per Producer Hired
*Insufficient Data
14
2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Producer Info
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Service Staff
Service Staff is defined in the study as typically non-commissioned employees who have responsibility—either directly (e.g., Account Executives (AE), Account Managers (AM), Customer Service Representatives (CSRs), Assistant CSRs, etc.) or indirectly (e.g., Claims Specialist, Placer/Marketer, etc.)—to provide or support the delivery of service to the agency’s clients.
Customer Service Staff
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Total # of Service Staff: (as defined above) % of Peer Agencies Having:
3.8
3.1
4.0
Separate/Dedicated Marketing Department Separate/Dedicated Claims Department Assistants for CSRs/Account Managers
12.9%
12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
0.0% 0.0%
6.5%
22.6%
37.5%
TPA Service Staff
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
% of Peer Agencies Having: Workers Comp TPA
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
# of Service Staff
* *
* *
* *
Total TPA Revenues Serviced
Group Benefits TPA
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
# of Service Staff
* *
* *
* *
Total TPA Revenues Serviced
*Insufficient Data
Customer Service Representatives (FTE)
In the following charts the number of CSRs includes Account Executives (non-producer position), Senior CSRs, CSRs, Account Managers, Assistant CSRs, etc. (i.e., positions with main responsibility for client service) . It also includes the department managers who spend a portion of their time servicing clients. Respondents were instructed to use decimals to accurately represent the actual number of full-time CSR positions. Staff dedicated to marketing, claims, and TPA departments are excluded from the following head counts.
15 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Service Staff Info
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Productivity—CSRs
Average Top 25%
How Time Was Spent
Commercial P&C CSRs/Account Managers
Number
1.9
High
5.0
Low
0.5
Average Book Serviced (Commissions) $218,757 $351,688
Average Pay ($)
$44,453
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
20.3%
Group L&H CSRs/Account Managers
Number
0.8
High
1.0
Low
0.5
Average Book Serviced (Commissions)
$69,430
*
Average Pay ($)
$31,701
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
45.7%
Personal P&C CSRs/Account Managers
Number
1.8
High
4.0
Low
0.5
Average Book Serviced (Commissions) $153,279 $253,660
Average Pay ($)
$35,778
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
23.3%
Multi-Line CSRs/Account Managers
Number
2.1
High
7.0
Low
0.5
Average Book Serviced (Commissions) $162,213 $257,705
Average Pay ($)
$34,075
Average Pay (% of Book Serviced)
21.0%
*Insufficient Data
16
2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Service Staff Info
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Technology
Average
Top 25%
Information Technology Number of Employees (FTE)
0.4 2.0 0.0
High
Low
Total IT Payroll Expense ($)
$13,155
$31,621
As % of Total Compensation Expense
3.0%
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Total IT Expenses for Fiscal Year (as % of Net Rev) 1
3.0%
2.4%
3.5%
1 Includes hardware/software leasing including offsite applications, supplies, maintenance & maintenance contracts, training, data lines, internet providers, website development/maintenance, outside consulting fees, computer depreciation, software amortization, and any non-depreciated hardware/software.
Agency Management System Utilized
Other includes Quickfile, Onstar management system and custom developed programs.
17 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Technology
Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Carriers
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Carrier Representation Personal Lines P&C National
3.4 4.0 7.4 3.5 3.6 7.1 3.3 4.0 1.3 1.3 0.9
2.8 3.6 6.4 2.4 3.3 5.6 3.5 4.7 1.8 1.9 1.3
3.3 3.9 7.1 3.0 4.4 7.4 3.8 5.0 1.8 2.1 1.4
Regional
Total
Commercial Lines P&C National
Regional
Total
Employee Benefits Life
Health
LTD
Dental
Retirement Products
10.8
13.1
14.1
Total
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Commission Income Derived from Top Carriers % of Net Revenue from Top P&C Carrier % of Net Revenue from Top 3 P&C Carriers % of Net Revenue from Top L&H/F Carrier % of Net Revenue from Top 3 L&H/F Carriers
27.7% 52.0%
25.5% 51.4%
31.4% 50.4%
5.8% 7.3%
6.0% 7.9%
9.3% 9.8%
Revenues from Top P&C Carrier - Breakdown by Line of Business
Use of Carrier Service Centers
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Service Center Use Total Personal Lines Comm. placed in Carrier Service Center Total Commercial Lines Comm. placed in Carrier Service Center
67.2%
*
*
11.1%
*
*
*Insufficient Data
18
2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Less than $1,250,000 | Insurance Carriers
2009 Best Practices Study
19
2009 Best Practices Study
2009 Best Practices Study
Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000
$1,250,000
$2,500,000
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$25,000,000
20
2009 Best Practices Study
Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
PROFILE (of Agencies in this Study Group)
A. Average Total Revenues: $1,939,760
B. Population Density of Metropolitan Areas Where Home Office is Located Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Less than 50,000 50,000 – 250,000 250,000 – 1,000,000 More than 1,000,000 C. Corporate Structure C
63.0% 14.8% 11.1% 11.1%
67.6% 14.7%
68.3% 17.1%
8.8% 8.8%
7.3% 7.3%
40.7% 48.1%
41.2% 47.1%
41.5% 46.3%
S
Partnership
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
LLC
11.1%
11.8%
12.2%
Sole Proprietorship
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6
1.7
1.3
Total # Agency locations
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
Agency has an ESOP
% of Stock Owned by ESOP
D. Shareholders Number of Shareholders (excluding ESOP)
2.8
2.8
4.7
High
10.0
Low
1.0
E. Ownership Percentage % Owned by Largest Shareholder (excluding ESOP)
67.1% 100.0% 28.3%
60.8%
52.9%
High
Low
F. Shareholder Age Current Age of Largest Shareholder
52.7
52.4
53.6
G. Parent Corporation
3.8%
Agency is Owned by Another Corporation
Description of Parent Corporation Financial Institution
100.0%
0.0% 0.0%
National Broker
Other
21 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000 | Profile
Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenues
(% by Source)
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Property & Casualty Commercial Commissions & Fees
51.9%
54.5%
59.5%
Bonds
2.2%
5.1%
2.3%
Personal P&C
24.8%
21.3%
17.6%
Value Added Services
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
Contingent/Bonus
11.3%
10.5%
10.0%
Total P&C
90.3%
91.5%
89.5%
Life & Health/Financial Group Commissions & Fees
5.6%
4.2%
6.3%
Individual Commissions & Fees
2.5%
1.5%
1.7%
Value Added Services
0.4%
1.2%
0.5%
Bonus/Overrides
0.1%
0.0%
0.3%
Total L&H/Financial
8.7%
6.8%
8.7%
Investments
0.9%
1.7%
1.9%
Miscellaneous
0.1%
0.0%
-0.2%
Gross Revenues
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Less Brokerage Commission Expense
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
Net Revenues
99.6%
100.0%
100.0%
Future Revenue Sources % of Agencies Considering Line of Business as Very Important:
Personal Lines
81.5% 77.8% 25.9% 40.7% 18.5%
Small Commercial Lines Individual Life & Health Group Life & Health
Surety/Bonding
22 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenues
% of Revenues Derived from:
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Largest Account
4.4% 9.7% 1.2%
4.5%
5.6%
High
Low
10 Largest Accounts
15.1% 29.9%
15.3%
20.6%
High
Low
3.1%
Acquired Revenues
Average Commissions Acquired
% of Agencies Acquiring
Percentage of Net Revenues
Acquisitions Made in Last 12 Months
11.1%
$403,775
16.2%
What the Typical Transactions Looked Like Revenues Acquired per Transaction
Multiples of Revenue Paid
Average
$345,583 $435,000 $595,000
Average
0.93x 0.80x 1.50x 0.50x
Median
Median
High
High
Low
$6,750
Low
23 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000
Profile
Revenues/ Expenses
Financial Stability
Employee Overview
Producer Info
Service Staff Info
Technology
Insurance Carriers
Appendix
Revenue Growth by Source
Average
+25% Profit
+25% Growth
Commercial P&C Renewals 1
1 Renewal Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. This figure is impacted by attrition (loss or retention of accounts) and by changes in premium and commission levels. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 2 New Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The higher the %, the more favorable the results. 3 Acquired Revenues as a % of prior year’s total revenues for this line of business. The % indicates the significance of acquired business. 4 Growth in Revenues from prior year excluding acquired revenues. 5 Growth in Revenues from prior year including acquired revenues.
85.2% 15.2%
92.4% 13.8%
90.6% 18.6%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
2.6% 0.4% 3.0%
7.6% 6.2%
0.0% 9.2% 9.2%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
13.8%
Bonds
Renewals 1
34.2% 63.4% 0.0% -2.4% -2.4%
28.7% 55.1%
23.6% 66.9% 0.0% -9.5% -9.5%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0%
Organic Growth 4
-16.2% -16.2%
Total Growth 5
Personal P&C
Renewals 1
91.7% 11.6%
94.9% 12.6%
95.8% 13.9%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
1.8% 3.3% 5.0%
6.1% 7.5%
0.0% 9.7% 9.7%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
13.7%
Value Added Services - P&C Renewals 1
49.9% 28.1%
* * * * *
* * * * *
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0%
Organic Growth 4
-22.0% -22.0%
Total Growth 5
Group L&H
Renewals 1
83.5% 20.9%
87.0% 8.3% 0.0% -4.7% -4.7%
57.5% 45.6%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 4.5% 4.5%
0.0% 3.1% 3.1%
Organic Growth 4
Total Growth 5
Individual L&H
Renewals 1
58.7% 50.7%
97.4% 17.7%
97.0% 22.6%
New Business 2
Acquired Revenues 3
0.0% 9.4% 9.4%
0.0%
0.0%
Organic Growth 4
15.1% 15.1%
19.6% 19.6%
Total Growth 5
*Insufficient Data
24 2009 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Between $1,250,000 and $2,500,000 | Revenues/Expenses
Made with FlippingBook